lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 12:31:58 -0700
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] device property: Remove some casts in property-entry-test

With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros
removed, several casts in property-entry-test are no longer required.

Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---

This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.

 drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c | 56 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
index 1106fedcceed..6071d5bc128c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
+++ b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8(node, "prop-u8", &val_u8);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u8, 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u8, 8);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16(node, "prop-u16", &val_u16);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u16, 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u16, 16);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u16");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "prop-u32", &val_u32);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u32, 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u32, 32);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "prop-u32");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -89,14 +89,14 @@ static void pe_test_uints(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64(node, "prop-u64", &val_u64);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u64, 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u64, 64);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u64");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 1);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -140,19 +140,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8(node, "prop-u8", &val_u8);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u8, 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u8, 8);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u8(node, "prop-u8");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[0], 8);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u8[1], 9);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[0], 8);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u8[1], 9);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(node, "prop-u8", array_u8, 17);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -165,19 +165,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16(node, "prop-u16", &val_u16);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u16, 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u16, 16);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u16(node, "prop-u16");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[0], 16);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u16[1], 17);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[0], 16);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u16[1], 17);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(node, "prop-u16", array_u16, 17);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -190,19 +190,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "prop-u32", &val_u32);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u32, 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u32, 32);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u32(node, "prop-u32");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[0], 32);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u32[1], 33);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[0], 32);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u32[1], 33);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "prop-u32", array_u32, 17);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -215,19 +215,19 @@ static void pe_test_uint_arrays(struct kunit *test)
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64(node, "prop-u64", &val_u64);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)val_u64, 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, val_u64, 64);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_count_u64(node, "prop-u64");
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 10);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[0], 64);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)array_u64[1], 65);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[0], 64);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, array_u64[1], 65);
 
 	error = fwnode_property_read_u64_array(node, "prop-u64", array_u64, 17);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
@@ -358,13 +358,13 @@ static void pe_test_move_inline_u8(struct kunit *test)
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, copy[0].is_inline);
 	data_ptr = (u8 *)&copy[0].value;
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[0], 1);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[1], 2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[0], 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[1], 2);
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, copy[1].is_inline);
 	data_ptr = copy[1].pointer;
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[0], 5);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)data_ptr[1], 6);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[0], 5);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data_ptr[1], 6);
 
 	property_entries_free(copy);
 }
-- 
2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ