[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <162093721042.5649.1489711837264906533.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 20:20:10 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sassmann@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as
__napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Wed, 12 May 2021 23:43:24 +0200 you wrote:
> __napi_schedule_irqoff() is an optimized version of __napi_schedule()
> which can be used where it is known that interrupts are disabled,
> e.g. in interrupt-handlers, spin_lock_irq() sections or hrtimer
> callbacks.
>
> On PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels this assumptions is not true. Force-
> threaded interrupt handlers and spinlocks are not disabling interrupts
> and the NAPI hrtimer callback is forced into softirq context which runs
> with interrupts enabled as well.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as __napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8380c81d5c4f
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists