[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALzav=e98KRgG+z5oezPmENKDt+NqtEA57ijYh3kMBZyduQUZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:32:42 -0700
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: X86: Bail out of direct yield in case of
under-comitted scenarios
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 7:01 PM Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
>
> In case of under-comitted scenarios, vCPU can get scheduling easily,
> kvm_vcpu_yield_to adds extra overhead, we can observe a lot of race
> between vcpu->ready is true and yield fails due to p->state is
> TASK_RUNNING. Let's bail out in such scenarios by checking the length
> of current cpu runqueue, it can be treated as a hint of under-committed
> instead of guarantee of accuracy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> * move the check after attempted counting
> * update patch description
>
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 9b6bca6..dfb7c32 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -8360,6 +8360,9 @@ static void kvm_sched_yield(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long dest_id)
>
> vcpu->stat.directed_yield_attempted++;
>
> + if (single_task_running())
> + goto no_yield;
Since this is a heuristic, do you have any experimental or real world
results that show the benefit?
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> map = rcu_dereference(vcpu->kvm->arch.apic_map);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists