lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9026d9a3-9f17-6686-d64e-009326ec6e90@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 08:42:36 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/IORT: Handle device properties with software node
 API

On 2021/5/11 21:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>  wrote:
>> The older device property API is going to be removed.
>> Replacing the device_add_properties() call with software
>> node API equivalent device_create_managed_software_node().
>>
>> Fixes: 434b73e61cc6 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits")
>> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> index 3912a1f6058e5..e34937e11186a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> @@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ static void iort_named_component_init(struct device *dev,
>>                                        FIELD_GET(ACPI_IORT_NC_PASID_BITS,
>>                                                  nc->node_flags));
>>
>> -       if (device_add_properties(dev, props))
>> +       if (device_create_managed_software_node(dev, props, NULL))
>>                  dev_warn(dev, "Could not add device properties\n");
>>   }
>>
>> --
> Thanks!
> 
> I can take this through the ACPI tree if there are no objections.

Since this is related to device property API refactor, I'm
fine with it.

Lorenzo, what's your position?

Thanks
Hanjun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ