[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <212498cf-376b-2dac-e1cd-12c7cc7910c6@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:31:50 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
CC: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
"Vinay Kumar Yadav" <vinay.yadav@...lsio.com>,
Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mirko Lindner <mlindner@...vell.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"Tariq Toukan" <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>,
Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sven Auhagen <sven.auhagen@...eatech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] page_pool: Allow drivers to hint on SKB
recycling
On 2021/5/14 15:36, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> [...]
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> + pp = (struct page_pool *)page->pp;
>>> +
>>> + /* Driver set this to memory recycling info. Reset it on recycle.
>>> + * This will *not* work for NIC using a split-page memory model.
>>> + * The page will be returned to the pool here regardless of the
>>> + * 'flipped' fragment being in use or not.
>>> + */
>>> + page->pp = NULL;
>>
>> Why not only clear the page->pp when the page can not be recycled
>> by the page pool? so that we do not need to set and clear it every
>> time the page is recycled。
>>
>
> If the page cannot be recycled, page->pp will not probably be set to begin
> with. Since we don't embed the feature in page_pool and we require the
> driver to explicitly enable it, as part of the 'skb flow', I'd rather keep
> it as is. When we set/clear the page->pp, the page is probably already in
> cache, so I doubt this will have any measurable impact.
The point is that we already have the skb->pp_recycle to let driver to
explicitly enable recycling, as part of the 'skb flow, if the page pool keep
the page->pp while it owns the page, then the driver may only need to call
one skb_mark_for_recycle() for a skb, instead of call skb_mark_for_recycle()
for each page frag of a skb.
Maybe we can add a parameter in "struct page_pool_params" to let driver
to decide if the page pool ptr is stored in page->pp while the page pool
owns the page?
Another thing accured to me is that if the driver use page from the
page pool to form a skb, and it does not call skb_mark_for_recycle(),
then there will be resource leaking, right? if yes, it seems the
skb_mark_for_recycle() call does not seems to add any value?
>
>>> + page_pool_put_full_page(pp, virt_to_head_page(data), false);
>>> +
>>> C(end);
>
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists