| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210514091943.GA13309@lpieralisi>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:19:43 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/7] PCI: Introduce pci_host_bridge::domain_nr
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:44:29PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> [Copy Rob]
>
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 11:52:45AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 08:16:30AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 10:46:29PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > Currently we retrieve the PCI domain number of the host bridge from the
> > > > bus sysdata (or pci_config_window if PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=y). Actually
> > > > we have the information at PCI host bridge probing time, and it makes
> > > > sense that we store it into pci_host_bridge. One benefit of doing so is
> > > > the requirement for supporting PCI on Hyper-V for ARM64, because the
> > > > host bridge of Hyper-V doesnt' have pci_config_window, whereas ARM64 is
> > > > a PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=y arch, so we cannot retrieve the PCI domain
> > > > number from pci_config_window on ARM64 Hyper-V guest.
> > > >
> > > > As the preparation for ARM64 Hyper-V PCI support, we introduce the
> > > > domain_nr in pci_host_bridge, and set it properly at probing time, then
> > > > for PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC=y archs, bus domain numbers are set by the
> > > > bridge domain_nr.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 2 ++
> > > > arch/arm/mach-dove/pcie.c | 2 ++
> > > > arch/arm/mach-mv78xx0/pcie.c | 2 ++
> > > > arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c | 2 ++
> > > > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 3 +--
> > > > arch/mips/pci/pci-legacy.c | 2 ++
> > > > arch/mips/pci/pci-xtalk-bridge.c | 2 ++
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-ftpci100.c | 2 ++
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 2 ++
> > > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 4 ++--
> > > > drivers/pci/probe.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > > include/linux/pci.h | 11 ++++++++---
> > > > 12 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > > > index e7ef2b5bea9c..4942cd681e41 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > > > @@ -471,6 +471,8 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
> > > > bridge->sysdata = sys;
> > > > bridge->busnr = sys->busnr;
> > > > bridge->ops = hw->ops;
> > > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC))
> > > > + bridge->domain_nr = pci_bus_find_domain_nr(sys, parent);
> > > >
> > > > ret = pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(bridge);
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-dove/pcie.c b/arch/arm/mach-dove/pcie.c
> > > > index ee91ac6b5ebf..92eb8484b49b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-dove/pcie.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-dove/pcie.c
> > > > @@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ dove_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> > > > bridge->sysdata = sys;
> > > > bridge->busnr = sys->busnr;
> > > > bridge->ops = &pcie_ops;
> > > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC))
> > > > + bridge->domain_nr = pci_bus_find_domain_nr(sys, NULL);
> > >
> > > The check for CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC is excessive because there is a
> > > stub for pci_bus_find_domain_nr().
> > >
> > > I'm not an expert in PCI, but maybe the repeated assignment of
> > > bridge->domain_nr can live in the generic code, say, in
> > > pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(). E.g. it will set the domain_nr when it is zero.
> > >
> > > >
> >
> > Yes, this churn should be avoided. We need a sentinel value to detect
> > whether the domain_nr is invalid (0 is a valid domain) so generic code
> > (ie pci_scan_root_bus_bridge() and friends) has to call generic
> > functions to get it (pci_bus_find_domain_nr()).
> >
>
> Agreed. Thank you all for the inputs.
>
> According to [1], "PCI Conventional" has at most 256 PCI bus segments
> and "PCI Express" has at most 65536 "PCI Segments Groups", so any value
> outside [0, 65536] can be used as a sentinel. I'm planning to use -1
> like:
>
> #define PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET (-1)
>
> (in pci_alloc_host_bridge())
> bridge->domain_nr = PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET;
>
> (in pci_register_host_bridge())
> if (bridge->domain_nr == PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET)
> bridge->domain_nr = pci_bus_find_domain_nr(...);
It should be fine. I'd move the check
if (bridge->domain_nr == PCI_DOMAIN_NR_NOT_SET)
in pci_bus_find_domain_nr()
to make the logic contained in there but that's a nit.
Lorenzo
> Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Boqun
>
> [1]: https://wiki.osdev.org/PCI_Express
>
> > We can implement it as a flag or function pointer in the struct
> > pci_host_bridge, if the flag or function pointer is not set the
> > generic pci_bus_find_domain_nr() should be called.
> >
> > Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists