linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: x86: Invoke hypercall when page encryption status is changed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJ5Bs6WLocS0vRp/@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 11:24:03 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>, seanjc@...gle.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
        joro@...tes.org, thomas.lendacky@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        srutherford@...gle.com, venu.busireddy@...cle.com,
        brijesh.singh@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: x86: Invoke hypercall when page encryption
 status is changed

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:03:18AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Ok, so explain to me how this looks from the submitter standpoint: he reads
> your review of his patch, he acknowledges your point with "Yes, it makes
> sense to signal it with a WARN or so", and still is treated as shit.

How is me asking about the user experience of it all, treating him like
shit?!

How should I have asked this so that it is not making you think I'm
treating him like shit?

Because treating someone like shit is not in my goals.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette