linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 2/2] drivers: base: Reduce device link removal code duplication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4326215.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher>
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 14:11:19 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        chenxiang <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] drivers: base: Reduce device link removal code duplication

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Reduce device link removal code duplication between the cases when
SRCU is enabled and when it is disabled by moving the only differing
piece of it (which is the removal of the link from the consumer and
supplier lists) into a separate wrapper function (defined differently
for each of the cases in question).

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/base/core.c |   31 +++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/core.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -198,6 +198,12 @@ static void device_link_synchronize_remo
 {
 	synchronize_srcu(&device_links_srcu);
 }
+
+static void device_link_remove_from_lists(struct device_link *link)
+{
+	list_del_rcu(&link->s_node);
+	list_del_rcu(&link->c_node);
+}
 #else /* !CONFIG_SRCU */
 static DECLARE_RWSEM(device_links_lock);
 
@@ -232,6 +238,12 @@ int device_links_read_lock_held(void)
 static inline void device_link_synchronize_removal(void)
 {
 }
+
+static void device_link_remove_from_lists(struct device_link *link)
+{
+	list_del(&link->s_node);
+	list_del(&link->c_node);
+}
 #endif /* !CONFIG_SRCU */
 
 static bool device_is_ancestor(struct device *dev, struct device *target)
@@ -854,7 +866,6 @@ out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_add);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SRCU
 static void __device_link_del(struct kref *kref)
 {
 	struct device_link *link = container_of(kref, struct device_link, kref);
@@ -864,25 +875,9 @@ static void __device_link_del(struct kre
 
 	pm_runtime_drop_link(link);
 
-	list_del_rcu(&link->s_node);
-	list_del_rcu(&link->c_node);
+	device_link_remove_from_lists(link);
 	device_unregister(&link->link_dev);
 }
-#else /* !CONFIG_SRCU */
-static void __device_link_del(struct kref *kref)
-{
-	struct device_link *link = container_of(kref, struct device_link, kref);
-
-	dev_info(link->consumer, "Dropping the link to %s\n",
-		 dev_name(link->supplier));
-
-	pm_runtime_drop_link(link);
-
-	list_del(&link->s_node);
-	list_del(&link->c_node);
-	device_unregister(&link->link_dev);
-}
-#endif /* !CONFIG_SRCU */
 
 static void device_link_put_kref(struct device_link *link)
 {