linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 15/22] dma-direct: Support PCI P2PDMA pages in dma-direct map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210514135712.GD4715@lst.de>
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 15:57:12 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Jakowski Andrzej <andrzej.jakowski@...el.com>,
        Minturn Dave B <dave.b.minturn@...el.com>,
        Jason Ekstrand <jason@...kstrand.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Xiong Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/22] dma-direct: Support PCI P2PDMA pages in
 dma-direct map_sg

> +	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
> +		if (sg_is_dma_pci_p2pdma(sg)) {
> +			sg_dma_unmark_pci_p2pdma(sg);
> +		} else  {

Double space here.  We also don't really need the curly braces to start
with.

> +	struct pci_p2pdma_map_state p2pdma_state = {};
> +	enum pci_p2pdma_map_type map;
>  	struct scatterlist *sg;
> +	int i, ret;
>  
>  	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
> +		if (is_pci_p2pdma_page(sg_page(sg))) {
> +			map = pci_p2pdma_map_segment(&p2pdma_state, dev, sg);
> +			switch (map) {

Why not just:

			switch (pci_p2pdma_map_segment(&p2pdma_state, dev,
					sg)) {

(even better with a shorter name for p2pdma_state so that it all fits on
a single line)?

> +			case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_BUS_ADDR:
> +				continue;
> +			case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE:
> +				/*
> +				 * Mapping through host bridge should be
> +				 * mapped normally, thus we do nothing
> +				 * and continue below.
> +				 */

I have a bit of a hard time parsing this comment.

> +		if (sg->dma_address == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto out_unmap;
> +		}
>  		sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -411,7 +443,7 @@ int dma_direct_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl, int nents,
>  
>  out_unmap:
>  	dma_direct_unmap_sg(dev, sgl, i, dir, attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> -	return -EINVAL;
> +	return ret;

Maybe just initialize ret to -EINVAL at declaration time to simplify this
a bit?