[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMdYzYqQ4gaFRD8wbdm9PRpT-ZeiL6WVj_eHKnF_uF=mKx3A4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:09:18 -0400
From: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: phy: add driver for Motorcomm yt8511 phy
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:09 AM Russell King (Oracle)
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:58:26AM -0400, Peter Geis wrote:
> > + /* set rgmii delay mode */
> > + val = __phy_read(phydev, YT8511_PAGE);
> > +
> > + switch (phydev->interface) {
> > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> > + val &= ~(YT8511_DELAY_RX | YT8511_DELAY_TX);
> > + break;
> > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> > + val |= YT8511_DELAY_RX | YT8511_DELAY_TX;
> > + break;
> > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
> > + val &= ~(YT8511_DELAY_TX);
> > + val |= YT8511_DELAY_RX;
> > + break;
> > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
> > + val &= ~(YT8511_DELAY_RX);
> > + val |= YT8511_DELAY_TX;
> > + break;
> > + default: /* leave everything alone in other modes */
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = __phy_write(phydev, YT8511_PAGE, val);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto err_restore_page;
>
> Another way of writing the above is to set "val" to be the value of the
> YT8511_DELAY_RX and YT8511_DELAY_TX bits, and then do:
>
> ret = __phy_modify(phydev, YT8511_PAGE,
> (YT8511_DELAY_RX | YT8511_DELAY_TX), val);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err_restore_page;
>
> which moves the read-modify-write out of the driver into core code and
> makes the driver code smaller. It also handles your missing error check
> on __phy_read() above - would you want the above code to attempt to
> write a -ve error number back to this register? I suspect not!
That makes sense, thanks!
I was thinking about how to use __phy_modify with a functional mask,
but it didn't click until I had already sent it in.
Also thanks for catching handling that ret on the read!
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists