[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <635649fa-dd98-c465-ffb4-7c0df9d4814e@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 17:39:55 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/33] mm: Add folio_get
On 5/14/21 4:24 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Nitpick: function names in subject should IMHO also end with (). But not a
>> reason for resend all patches that don't...
>
> Hm, I thought it was preferred to not do that.
Hm, no idea if there's a concensus on that, actually.
> I can fix it
> easily enough when I go through and add the R-b.
If I was right...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists