[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJ6pQVsCKPoJ8wQF@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 18:45:53 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 12/25] net: dsa: qca8k: limit port5 delay
to qca8337
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 04:04:47AM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> Limit port5 rx delay to qca8337. This is taken from the legacy QSDK code
> that limits the rx delay on port5 to only this particular switch version,
> on other switch only the tx and rx delay for port0 are needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
This should really be controlled by the phy-mode, but i suspect it is
too late to fix now without breaking some boards.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists