[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7cc30a8a6644bb60e5f3358e89253d9fc783fe54.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:38:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/e820: Use pr_debug to avoid spamming dmesg log
with debug messages
On Tue, 2021-05-11 at 17:31 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> That said, I do see the value in not having to open code the branch stuff, and
> making pr_debug() consistent with printk which does return a value. So that
> makes sense to me.
IMO: printk should not return a value.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists