lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 14:15:53 -0500
From:   Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev-es: Invalidate the GHCB after completing VMGEXIT

On 5/14/21 2:12 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Since the VMGEXIT instruction can be issued from userspace, invalidate
> the GHCB after performing VMGEXIT processing in the kernel.
> 
> Invalidation is only required after userspace is available, so call
> vc_ghcb_invalidate() from sev_es_put_ghcb(). Update vc_ghcb_invalidate()
> to additionally clear the GHCB exit code, so that a value of 0 is always
> present outside VMGEXIT processing in the kernel.
> 
> Since vc_ghcb_invalidate() is part of sev-shared.c, move sev_es_put_ghcb()
> down to after where sev-shared.c is included.
> 
> Fixes: 0786138c78e79 ("x86/sev-es: Add a Runtime #VC Exception Handler")
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/sev.c        | 37 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

I was debating whether to do this as two patches, with the first patch
moving sev_es_put_ghcb() and then the second patch would more clearly show
the changes related to the invalidation.

Let me know if that would be preferred and I'll re-submit this as a
two-patch series.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> index 6ec8b3bfd76e..9f90f460a28c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static bool sev_es_negotiate_protocol(void)
>  
>  static __always_inline void vc_ghcb_invalidate(struct ghcb *ghcb)
>  {
> +	ghcb->save.sw_exit_code = 0;
>  	memset(ghcb->save.valid_bitmap, 0, sizeof(ghcb->save.valid_bitmap));
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> index 9578c82832aa..5ccb0218c885 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> @@ -221,24 +221,6 @@ static __always_inline struct ghcb *sev_es_get_ghcb(struct ghcb_state *state)
>  	return ghcb;
>  }
>  
> -static __always_inline void sev_es_put_ghcb(struct ghcb_state *state)
> -{
> -	struct sev_es_runtime_data *data;
> -	struct ghcb *ghcb;
> -
> -	data = this_cpu_read(runtime_data);
> -	ghcb = &data->ghcb_page;
> -
> -	if (state->ghcb) {
> -		/* Restore GHCB from Backup */
> -		*ghcb = *state->ghcb;
> -		data->backup_ghcb_active = false;
> -		state->ghcb = NULL;
> -	} else {
> -		data->ghcb_active = false;
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  /* Needed in vc_early_forward_exception */
>  void do_early_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
>  
> @@ -461,6 +443,25 @@ static enum es_result vc_slow_virt_to_phys(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt
>  /* Include code shared with pre-decompression boot stage */
>  #include "sev-shared.c"
>  
> +static __always_inline void sev_es_put_ghcb(struct ghcb_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct sev_es_runtime_data *data;
> +	struct ghcb *ghcb;
> +
> +	data = this_cpu_read(runtime_data);
> +	ghcb = &data->ghcb_page;
> +
> +	if (state->ghcb) {
> +		/* Restore GHCB from Backup */
> +		*ghcb = *state->ghcb;
> +		data->backup_ghcb_active = false;
> +		state->ghcb = NULL;
> +	} else {
> +		vc_ghcb_invalidate(ghcb);
> +		data->ghcb_active = false;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  void noinstr __sev_es_nmi_complete(void)
>  {
>  	struct ghcb_state state;
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ