[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42f70914-e46c-20b9-6b13-8e8d855112a9@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 21:38:52 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/surface: aggregator: shut up clang
-Wconstantn-conversion warning
Hi,
On 5/14/21 4:21 PM, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> On 5/14/21 4:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>
>> Clang complains about the assignment of SSAM_ANY_IID to
>> ssam_device_uid->instance:
>>
>> drivers/platform/surface/surface_aggregator_registry.c:478:25: error: implicit conversion from 'int' to '__u8' (aka 'unsigned char') changes value from 65535 to 255 [-Werror,-Wconstant-conversion]
>> { SSAM_VDEV(HUB, 0x02, SSAM_ANY_IID, 0x00) },
>> ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/surface_aggregator/device.h:71:23: note: expanded from macro 'SSAM_ANY_IID'
>> #define SSAM_ANY_IID 0xffff
>> ^~~~~~
>> include/linux/surface_aggregator/device.h:126:63: note: expanded from macro 'SSAM_VDEV'
>> SSAM_DEVICE(SSAM_DOMAIN_VIRTUAL, SSAM_VIRTUAL_TC_##cat, tid, iid, fun)
>> ^~~
>> include/linux/surface_aggregator/device.h:102:41: note: expanded from macro 'SSAM_DEVICE'
>> .instance = ((iid) != SSAM_ANY_IID) ? (iid) : 0, \
>> ^~~
>>
>> The assignment doesn't actually happen, but clang checks the type limits
>> before checking whether this assignment is reached. Shut up the warning
>> using an explicit type cast.
>
> I'm not too happy about this fix as (I believe) it will also shut up any
> valid GCC error message in case those macros are used with non-u8 (and
> non-SSAM_ANY_xxx) values.
Since you're the maintainer of this code, I'll go with your judgement here,
esp. since as the commit msg states SSAM_ANY_IID is never actually
assigned to .instance, instead it gets set to 0.
So this is a false-positive compiler warning, which may be best fixed in
the compiler itself.
With that said I think this is the second time this comes up now, maybe
we should add a comment to the code about the clang warning ?
Regards,
Hans
>
> I'll let others judge and decide what's preferred, however.
>
> In case you're deciding to apply this, feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Max
>
>> Fixes: eb0e90a82098 ("platform/surface: aggregator: Add dedicated bus and device type")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> ---
>> include/linux/surface_aggregator/device.h | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/surface_aggregator/device.h b/include/linux/surface_aggregator/device.h
>> index 4441ad667c3f..90df092ed565 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/surface_aggregator/device.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/surface_aggregator/device.h
>> @@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ struct ssam_device_uid {
>> | (((fun) != SSAM_ANY_FUN) ? SSAM_MATCH_FUNCTION : 0), \
>> .domain = d, \
>> .category = cat, \
>> - .target = ((tid) != SSAM_ANY_TID) ? (tid) : 0, \
>> - .instance = ((iid) != SSAM_ANY_IID) ? (iid) : 0, \
>> - .function = ((fun) != SSAM_ANY_FUN) ? (fun) : 0 \
>> + .target = ((tid) != SSAM_ANY_TID) ? (u8)(tid) : 0, \
>> + .instance = ((iid) != SSAM_ANY_IID) ? (u8)(iid) : 0, \
>> + .function = ((fun) != SSAM_ANY_FUN) ? (u8)(fun) : 0 \
>> /**
>> * SSAM_VDEV() - Initialize a &struct ssam_device_id as virtual device with
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists