linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] thunderbolt: test: Remove sone casts which are no longer required

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9bc6cbc-2196-3418-4c8d-f47981cc8816@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 13:57:20 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] thunderbolt: test: Remove sone casts which are
 no longer required

On 5/14/21 1:27 AM, David Gow wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:08 PM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:32:01PM -0700, David Gow wrote:
>>> With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros
>>> removed, several casts in the thunderbolt KUnit tests are no longer
>>> required.
>>>
>>> Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> Does this go through KUnit tree or you want me to take it? In case of
>> the former feel free to add:
>>
>> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>>
> 
> Thanks. I think it's probably easier for this to go in via the KUnit
> tree, unless Brendan or Shuah have any objections.
> 

It is fine either way unless there are dependencies on the KUnit
tree. I can take this in through KUnit once Brendan looks at it.

thanks,
-- Shuah