lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210515005550.GQ975577@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 17:55:50 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcsan: fix debugfs initcall return type

On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 01:01:31AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:18 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:11:05PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > 
> > > > You can see my response to Marco here:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/ad7fa126-f371-5a24-1d80-27fe8f655b05@kernel.org/
> > > >
> > > > Maybe some improved wording might look like
> > > >
> > > > clang with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG points out that an initcall function should
> > > > return an 'int' due to the changes made to the initcall macros in commit
> > > > 3578ad11f3fb ("init: lto: fix PREL32 relocations"):
> > >
> > > OK, so the naive reading was correct, thank you!
> > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Arnd, do you have any objections?
> > >
> > > In the meantime, here is what I have.  Please let me know of any needed
> > > updates.
> > >
> > 
> > Looks good to me, thanks for the improvements!
> 
> FWIW, this prompted me to see if I can convince the compiler to complain
> in all configs. The below is what I came up with and will send once the
> fix here has landed. Need to check a few other config+arch combinations
> (allyesconfig with gcc on x86_64 is good).

Cool!

If I have not sent the pull request for Arnd's fix by Wednesday, please
remind me.

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> -- Marco
> 
> ------ >8 ------
> 
> >From 96c1c4e9902e96485268909d5ea8f91b9595e187 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 21:08:50 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] init: verify that function is initcall_t at compile-time
> 
> In the spirit of making it hard to misuse an interface, add a
> compile-time assertion in the CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS case
> to verify the initcall function matches initcall_t, because the inline
> asm bypasses any type-checking the compiler would otherwise do. This
> will help developers catch incorrect API use in all configurations.
> 
> A recent example of this is:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210514140015.2944744-1-arnd@kernel.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/init.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/init.h b/include/linux/init.h
> index 045ad1650ed1..d82b4b2e1d25 100644
> --- a/include/linux/init.h
> +++ b/include/linux/init.h
> @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ extern bool initcall_debug;
>  	asm(".section	\"" __sec "\", \"a\"		\n"	\
>  	    __stringify(__name) ":			\n"	\
>  	    ".long	" __stringify(__stub) " - .	\n"	\
> -	    ".previous					\n");
> +	    ".previous					\n");	\
> +	static_assert(__same_type(initcall_t, &fn));
>  #else
>  #define ____define_initcall(fn, __unused, __name, __sec)	\
>  	static initcall_t __name __used 			\
> -- 
> 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ