linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio:adc:ad7766: Fix unnecessary check in ad7766

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210516102306.4487d222@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sun, 16 May 2021 10:23:06 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     tangbin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, knaack.h@....de,
        pmeerw@...erw.net, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio:adc:ad7766: Fix unnecessary check in ad7766_probe()

On Fri, 14 May 2021 14:12:45 +0800
tangbin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan:
> 
> On 2021/5/14 0:03, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 May 2021 21:47:39 +0800
> > Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> In the function ad7766_probe(), the return value of
> >> devm_iio_device_register() can be zero or ret, Thus it
> >> is unnecessary to repeated check here.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>  
> > Hi Tang Bin,
> >
> > A quick query on this sign off sequence as I'd like to check what the
> > intended meaning is.
> >
> > If you both developed this patch, please use the Co-developed-by: tag
> > to indicate that.   If Zhang Shengju wrote the patch then you sent it
> > upstream, please fix the 'from' field on the email to reflect that.
> >
> > Patch itself is good.  
> 
> Thanks for your reply, it's my mistake, this place should use:
> 
>      Co-developed-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>

Thanks for clarifying that.

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to see if we missed anything.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tang Bin
> 
> 
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >  
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c | 5 +----
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
> >> index b6b6765be..acf56e987 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7766.c
> >> @@ -291,10 +291,7 @@ static int ad7766_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >>   	if (ret)
> >>   		return ret;
> >>   
> >> -	ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
> >> -	if (ret)
> >> -		return ret;
> >> -	return 0;
> >> +	return devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
> >>   }
> >>   
> >>   static const struct spi_device_id ad7766_id[] = {  
> 
>