linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 003/141] tpm, tpm_tis: Reserve locality in tpm_tis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210517140242.864281724@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 16:00:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 003/141] tpm, tpm_tis: Reserve locality in tpm_tis_resume()

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>

commit 8a2d296aaebadd68d9c1f6908667df1d1c84c051 upstream.

Reserve locality in tpm_tis_resume(), as it could be unsert after waking
up from a sleep state.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Fixes: a3fbfae82b4c ("tpm: take TPM chip power gating out of tpm_transmit()")
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -1035,12 +1035,20 @@ int tpm_tis_resume(struct device *dev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* TPM 1.2 requires self-test on resume. This function actually returns
+	/*
+	 * TPM 1.2 requires self-test on resume. This function actually returns
 	 * an error code but for unknown reason it isn't handled.
 	 */
-	if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2))
+	if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) {
+		ret = request_locality(chip, 0);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+
 		tpm1_do_selftest(chip);
 
+		release_locality(chip, 0);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_tis_resume);