linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] siginfo: ABI fixes for v5.13-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1wnrx750c.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 10:29:39 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] siginfo: ABI fixes for v5.13-rc2

Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> writes:

> * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>> Looking deeper it was discovered that si_trapno is used for only
>> a few select signals on alpha and sparc, and that none of the
>> other _sigfault fields past si_addr are used at all.  Which means
>> technically no regression on alpha and sparc.
>
> If there's no functional regression on any platform, could much of this 
> wait until v5.14, or do we want some of these cleanups right now?
>
> The fixes seem to be for long-existing bugs, not fresh regressions, AFAICS. 
> The asserts & cleanups are useful, but not regression fixes.
>
> I.e. this is a bit scary:

The new ABI for SIGTRAP TRAP perf that came in the merge window is
broken and wrong.  We need to revert/disable the new SIGTRAP TRAP_PERF
or have a fix before v5.13.

The issue is old crap getting in the way of a new addition.  I think I
might see a smaller code change on how to get to something compatible
with this.

>>  32 files changed, 377 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-)
>
> at -rc2 time.

The additions are all tests to make certain everything is fine.
The actual code change without the assertions (tests) is essentially
a wash.

Eric