linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 197/289] powerpc/64s: Fix crashes when toggling stf barrier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210517140311.743968416@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 16:02:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 197/289] powerpc/64s: Fix crashes when toggling stf barrier

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>

commit 8ec7791bae1327b1c279c5cd6e929c3b12daaf0a upstream.

The STF (store-to-load forwarding) barrier mitigation can be
enabled/disabled at runtime via a debugfs file (stf_barrier), which
causes the kernel to patch itself to enable/disable the relevant
mitigations.

However depending on which mitigation we're using, it may not be safe to
do that patching while other CPUs are active. For example the following
crash:

  User access of kernel address (c00000003fff5af0) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
  segfault (11) at c00000003fff5af0 nip 7fff8ad12198 lr 7fff8ad121f8 code 1
  code: 40820128 e93c00d0 e9290058 7c292840 40810058 38600000 4bfd9a81 e8410018
  code: 2c030006 41810154 3860ffb6 e9210098 <e94d8ff0> 7d295279 39400000 40820a3c

Shows that we returned to userspace without restoring the user r13
value, due to executing the partially patched STF exit code.

Fix it by doing the patching under stop machine. The CPUs that aren't
doing the patching will be spinning in the core of the stop machine
logic. That is currently sufficient for our purposes, because none of
the patching we do is to that code or anywhere in the vicinity.

Fixes: a048a07d7f45 ("powerpc/64s: Add support for a store forwarding barrier at kernel entry/exit")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.17+
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210506044959.1298123-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
+#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
 #include <asm/cputable.h>
 #include <asm/code-patching.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
@@ -227,11 +228,25 @@ static void do_stf_exit_barrier_fixups(e
 		                                           : "unknown");
 }
 
+static int __do_stf_barrier_fixups(void *data)
+{
+	enum stf_barrier_type *types = data;
+
+	do_stf_entry_barrier_fixups(*types);
+	do_stf_exit_barrier_fixups(*types);
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 void do_stf_barrier_fixups(enum stf_barrier_type types)
 {
-	do_stf_entry_barrier_fixups(types);
-	do_stf_exit_barrier_fixups(types);
+	/*
+	 * The call to the fallback entry flush, and the fallback/sync-ori exit
+	 * flush can not be safely patched in/out while other CPUs are executing
+	 * them. So call __do_stf_barrier_fixups() on one CPU while all other CPUs
+	 * spin in the stop machine core with interrupts hard disabled.
+	 */
+	stop_machine(__do_stf_barrier_fixups, &types, NULL);
 }
 
 void do_uaccess_flush_fixups(enum l1d_flush_type types)