lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210517163623.GA21579@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 11:36:23 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] PCI: dwc: pci-dra7xx: miscellaneous improvements

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:41:17PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> This is an series of mixed improvements to the DRA7 PCI controller driver:
> allow building as a loadabel module, allow to get and enable a clock and a
> small cleanup.
> 
> Luca
> 
> Luca Ceresoli (5):
>   PCI: dwc: export more symbols to allow modular drivers
>   PCI: dwc: pci-dra7xx: make it a kernel module
>   PCI: dwc: pci-dra7xx: allow to build as a loadable module
>   PCI: dwc: pci-dra7xx: remove unused include
>   PCI: dwc: pci-dra7xx: get an optional clock

This driver has a poor record of subject lines:

  PCI: pci-dra7xx: Prepare for deferred probe with module_platform_driver
  PCI: dwc: Move dw_pcie_setup_rc() to DWC common code
  PCI: dwc/dra7xx: Use the common MSI irq_chip
  PCI: dwc: pci-dra7xx: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error

The "PCI: dwc:" ones are fine -- they apply to the shared dwc core,
not specifically to dra7xx.

The driver-specific ones:

  PCI: pci-dra7xx:
  PCI: dwc/dra7xx:
  PCI: dwc: pci-dra7xx:

are redundant and waste space.  There's no need to mention "dwc" for
dra7xx-specific things, and no need to mention "PCI" twice.

We should use the "PCI: dra7xx:" prefix for things specific to this
driver.

The rest of the subject line should start with a capital letter.  The
subject line should contain specific information when practical.  For
example,

  PCI: dwc: Export dw_pcie_link_up(), dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar() for modular drivers
  PCI: dra7xx: Allow building as module
  PCI: dra7xx: Remove unused linux/init.h include
  PCI: dra7xx: Get optional external clock

I would squash 2/5 and 3/5, similar to a98d2187efd9 ("PCI: meson:
Build as module by default") and 526a76991b7b ("PCI: aardvark:
Implement driver 'remove' function and allow to build it as module").

>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig            |  6 +++---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c       | 21 +++++++++++++++++--
>  .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c   |  1 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c  |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ