linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: scheduler: fixed 2 typos in sched-nice-design.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pmxp19r2.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 12:43:45 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Chun-Hung Tseng <henrybear327@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chun-Hung Tseng <henrybear327@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: scheduler: fixed 2 typos in
 sched-nice-design.rst

Chun-Hung Tseng <henrybear327@...il.com> writes:

> This patch fixed 2 spelling errors in the documentation.

Next time, word this in the imperative form ("Fix two spelling
errors...") and leave out "this patch".  Meanwhile...

> Signed-off-by: Chun-Hung Tseng <henrybear327@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst
> index 0571f1b47e64..889bf2b737dc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ within the constraints of HZ and jiffies and their nasty design level
>  coupling to timeslices and granularity it was not really viable.
>  
>  The second (less frequent but still periodically occurring) complaint
> -about Linux's nice level support was its assymetry around the origo
> +about Linux's nice level support was its asymmetry around the origin
>  (which you can see demonstrated in the picture above), or more

Applied, thanks.

jon