[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210517193908.3113-5-sargun@sargun.me>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 12:39:08 -0700
From: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, containers@...ts.linux.dev,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...volk.io>,
Mauricio Vásquez Bernal <mauricio@...volk.io>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/seccomp: Add test for atomic addfd+send
From: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...volk.io>
This just adds a test to verify that when using the new introduced flag
to ADDFD, a valid fd is added and returned as the syscall result.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...volk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Acked-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 98c3b647f54d..e2ba7adc2694 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -235,6 +235,10 @@ struct seccomp_notif_addfd {
};
#endif
+#ifndef SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND
+#define SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND (1UL << 1) /* Addfd and return it, atomically */
+#endif
+
struct seccomp_notif_addfd_small {
__u64 id;
char weird[4];
@@ -3976,8 +3980,14 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
if (pid == 0) {
+ /* fds will be added and this value is expected */
if (syscall(__NR_getppid) != USER_NOTIF_MAGIC)
exit(1);
+
+ /* Atomic addfd+send is received here. Check it is a valid fd */
+ if (fcntl(syscall(__NR_getppid), F_GETFD) == -1)
+ exit(1);
+
exit(syscall(__NR_getppid) != USER_NOTIF_MAGIC);
}
@@ -4056,6 +4066,30 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV, &req), 0);
ASSERT_EQ(addfd.id, req.id);
+ /* Verify we can do an atomic addfd and send */
+ addfd.newfd = 0;
+ addfd.flags = SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND;
+ fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd);
+
+ /* Child has fds 0-6 and 42 used, we expect the lower fd available: 7 */
+ EXPECT_EQ(fd, 7);
+ EXPECT_EQ(filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, fd), 0);
+
+ /*
+ * This sets the ID of the ADD FD to the last request plus 1. The
+ * notification ID increments 1 per notification.
+ */
+ addfd.id = req.id + 1;
+
+ /* This spins until the underlying notification is generated */
+ while (ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd) != -1 &&
+ errno != -EINPROGRESS)
+ nanosleep(&delay, NULL);
+
+ memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
+ ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV, &req), 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(addfd.id, req.id);
+
resp.id = req.id;
resp.error = 0;
resp.val = USER_NOTIF_MAGIC;
@@ -4116,6 +4150,10 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd_rlimit)
EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
EXPECT_EQ(errno, EMFILE);
+ addfd.flags = SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND;
+ EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(errno, EMFILE);
+
addfd.newfd = 100;
addfd.flags = SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SETFD;
EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists