[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALMp9eSR3tAZx3iW4_aVRWtFvVma-NYC979SDG5z3MG-F4M5dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 14:09:47 -0700
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Kechen Lu <kechenl@...dia.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Invert APICv/AVIC enablement check
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:03 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > Currently, APICv/AVIC enablement is global ('enable_apicv' module parameter
> > for Intel, 'avic' module parameter for AMD) but there's no way to check
> > it from vendor-neutral code. Add 'apicv_supported()' to kvm_x86_ops and
> > invert kvm_apicv_init() (which now doesn't need to be called from arch-
> > specific code).
>
> Rather than add a new hook, just move the variable to x86.c, and export it so
> that VMX and SVM can give it different module names. The only hiccup is that
> avic is off by default, but I don't see why that can't be changed.
See https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg208722.html.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists