[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKMCZWhhNS9kIOoR@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 08:55:17 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.12 123/363] watchdog: cleanup handling of false
positives
On (21/05/17 16:30), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2021-05-17 15:59:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 9bf3bc949f8aeefeacea4b1198db833b722a8e27 ]
> >
> > Commit d6ad3e286d2c ("softlockup: Add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel
> > warning on kgdb resume") introduced touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync().
>
> [...]
>
> > Make the code more straightforward:
> >
> > 1. Always call kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused() at the very
> > beginning to handle PVCLOCK_GUEST_STOPPED. It touches the watchdog
> > when the quest did sleep.
> >
> > 2. Handle the situation when the watchdog has been touched
> > (SOFTLOCKUP_DELAY_REPORT is set).
> >
> > Call sched_clock_tick() when touch_*sync() variant was used. It makes
> > sure that the timestamp will be up to date even when it has been
> > touched in atomic context or quest did sleep.
> >
> > As a result, kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused() is called on a single
> > location. And the right timestamp is always set when returning from the
> > timer callback.
> >
> > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311122130.6788-7-pmladek@suse.com
>
> Please, remove this patch from the stable backport. It might
> cause false softlockup reports, see
Oh, I didn't know about the stable backport. Thank you for taking care of it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists