[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93a10a341eccd8b680cdcc422947e4a1b83099db.camel@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 12:00:19 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+95afd23673f5dd295c57@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com" <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in rtl8152_probe
Am Montag, den 17.05.2021, 01:01 +0000 schrieb Hayes Wang:
> Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:33 PM
> > So if a peculiar emulated device created by syzbot is capable of
> > crashing the driver, then somewhere there is a bug which needs to
> > be
> > fixed. It's true that fixing all these bugs might not protect
> > against a
> > malicious device which deliberately behaves in an apparently
> > reasonable
> > manner. But it does reduce the attack surface.
>
> Thanks for your response.
> I will add some checks.
Hi,
the problem in this particular case is in
static bool rtl_vendor_mode(struct usb_interface *intf)
which accepts any config number. It needs to bail out
if you find config #0 to be what the descriptors say,
treating that as an unrecoverable error.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists