linux-kernel - [PATCH] mmc: mediatek: use data instead of mrq parameter from msdc_{un}prepare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210517100900.1620-1-zbestahu@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 18:09:00 +0800
From:   Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com>
To:     chaotian.jing@...iatek.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com
Cc:     linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, huyue2@...ong.com, zbestahu@....com
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: mediatek: use data instead of mrq parameter from msdc_{un}prepare_data()

From: Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>

We already have 'mrq->data' before calling these two functions, no
need to find it again via 'mrq->data' internally. Also remove local
data variable accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
index 898ed1b..c4db944 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
@@ -724,10 +724,8 @@ static inline void msdc_dma_setup(struct msdc_host *host, struct msdc_dma *dma,
 	writel(lower_32_bits(dma->gpd_addr), host->base + MSDC_DMA_SA);
 }
 
-static void msdc_prepare_data(struct msdc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
+static void msdc_prepare_data(struct msdc_host *host, struct mmc_data *data)
 {
-	struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
-
 	if (!(data->host_cookie & MSDC_PREPARE_FLAG)) {
 		data->host_cookie |= MSDC_PREPARE_FLAG;
 		data->sg_count = dma_map_sg(host->dev, data->sg, data->sg_len,
@@ -735,10 +733,8 @@ static void msdc_prepare_data(struct msdc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 	}
 }
 
-static void msdc_unprepare_data(struct msdc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
+static void msdc_unprepare_data(struct msdc_host *host, struct mmc_data *data)
 {
-	struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
-
 	if (data->host_cookie & MSDC_ASYNC_FLAG)
 		return;
 
@@ -1140,7 +1136,7 @@ static void msdc_request_done(struct msdc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 
 	msdc_track_cmd_data(host, mrq->cmd, mrq->data);
 	if (mrq->data)
-		msdc_unprepare_data(host, mrq);
+		msdc_unprepare_data(host, mrq->data);
 	if (host->error)
 		msdc_reset_hw(host);
 	mmc_request_done(mmc_from_priv(host), mrq);
@@ -1311,7 +1307,7 @@ static void msdc_ops_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 	host->mrq = mrq;
 
 	if (mrq->data)
-		msdc_prepare_data(host, mrq);
+		msdc_prepare_data(host, mrq->data);
 
 	/* if SBC is required, we have HW option and SW option.
 	 * if HW option is enabled, and SBC does not have "special" flags,
@@ -1332,7 +1328,7 @@ static void msdc_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 	if (!data)
 		return;
 
-	msdc_prepare_data(host, mrq);
+	msdc_prepare_data(host, data);
 	data->host_cookie |= MSDC_ASYNC_FLAG;
 }
 
@@ -1340,14 +1336,14 @@ static void msdc_post_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq,
 		int err)
 {
 	struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
-	struct mmc_data *data;
+	struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
 
-	data = mrq->data;
 	if (!data)
 		return;
+
 	if (data->host_cookie) {
 		data->host_cookie &= ~MSDC_ASYNC_FLAG;
-		msdc_unprepare_data(host, mrq);
+		msdc_unprepare_data(host, data);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1