linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: mark prepare_page_table as _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbCdvk45DNgnJVD8yOA8aNY5n42JyNh66EvfUgts4uK2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 12:21:59 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Hailong Liu <carver4lio@....com>,
        Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mark prepare_page_table as __init

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:04 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:

> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> In some configurations when building with gcc-11, prepare_page_table
> does not get inline, which causes a build time warning for a section
> mismatch:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0xce8): Section mismatch in reference from the function prepare_page_table() to the (unknown reference) .init.data:(unknown)
> The function prepare_page_table() references
> the (unknown reference) __initdata (unknown).
> This is often because prepare_page_table lacks a __initdata
> annotation or the annotation of (unknown) is wrong.
>
> Mark the function as __init to avoid the warning regardless of the
> inlining.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Like the others say, drop inline, with that:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij