[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210517125859.GA25228@linux>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 14:59:03 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm,hwpoison: make get_hwpoison_page call
get_any_page()
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 01:54:01PM +0900, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page)
> {
> struct page *head = compound_head(page);
> @@ -1098,7 +1091,9 @@ static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> - if (PageHuge(head) && (HPageFreed(head) || HPageMigratable(head)))
> + if (!PageHuge(head))
> + ret = -EBUSY;
Unless I'm missing something, we will be returning -EBUSY for any non-hugetlb
page, which is not right.
I think what you want is to return -EBUSY in case the page is a hugetlb page
but we cannot grab a refcount because the page is in a floating state, meaning
!HPageFreed && !HPageMigratable.
Right?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists