| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 15:44:48 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] staging: media: atomisp: use __func__ over
function names
Em Wed, 28 Apr 2021 23:37:54 +0530
Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com> escreveu:
> Replace hard coded function names from the debug print strings by
> standard __func__ predefined identifier. This resolves following
> checkpatch script WARNING:
> Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using function's name, in a string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v3:
> - None.
> Changes since v2:
> - None.
> Changes since v1:
> - None.
Huh? Why are you sending a new version when there's no difference
from the past ones?
>
> .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 2 +-
> .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 2 +-
> .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c | 2 +-
> .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> index d68a2bcc9ae1..b572551f1a0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> @@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ static int gc0310_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> struct gc0310_device *dev = to_gc0310_sensor(sd);
>
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "gc0310_remove...\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
>
As Dan already pointed, please delete this and other
dev_dbg() that are just tracing functions without any other
real meaning. If one needs that, ftrace could be used.
> dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> index e722c639b60d..548c572d3b57 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> @@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ static int gc2235_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> struct gc2235_device *dev = to_gc2235_sensor(sd);
>
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "gc2235_remove...\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
>
> dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> index 7ca7378b1859..ab10fd98dbc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static int lm3554_detect(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> int ret;
>
> if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA)) {
> - dev_err(&client->dev, "lm3554_detect i2c error\n");
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s i2c error\n", __func__);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> index f167781e258a..a51ad9843d39 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int ov2680_g_bin_factor_x(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32 *val)
> struct ov2680_device *dev = to_ov2680_sensor(sd);
> struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
>
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_g_bin_factor_x\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
> *val = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].bin_factor_x;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int ov2680_g_bin_factor_y(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32 *val)
> struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
>
> *val = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].bin_factor_y;
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_g_bin_factor_y\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int ov2680_get_intg_factor(struct i2c_client *client,
> u16 reg_val;
> int ret;
>
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_get_intg_factor\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
> if (!info)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static long __ov2680_set_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int coarse_itg,
> int ret, exp_val;
>
> dev_dbg(&client->dev,
> - "+++++++__ov2680_set_exposure coarse_itg %d, gain %d, digitgain %d++\n",
> - coarse_itg, gain, digitgain);
> + "+++++++%s coarse_itg %d, gain %d, digitgain %d++\n",
> + __func__, coarse_itg, gain, digitgain);
This one for instance, is not a plain trace, so it could make
sense to be kept, but please remove those "+++..." sequences
from the string, as this has no meaning. So, just:
dev_dbg(&client->dev,
"%s: coarse_itg %d, gain %d, digitgain %d\n",
__func__, coarse_itg, gain, digitgain);
would be enough.
>
> vts = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].lines_per_frame;
>
> @@ -1060,9 +1060,9 @@ static int ov2680_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int enable)
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->input_lock);
> if (enable)
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_s_stream one\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s one\n", __func__);
There's a typo here:
one -> on
Please fix.
> else
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_s_stream off\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s off\n", __func__);
Btw, the entire logic above could be re-written as:
dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s: %s\n", __func__,
enable ? "on" : "off");
>
> ret = ov2680_write_reg(client, 1, OV2680_SW_STREAM,
> enable ? OV2680_START_STREAMING :
> @@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ static int ov2680_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> struct ov2680_device *dev = to_ov2680_sensor(sd);
>
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_remove...\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
>
> dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
> index d046a9804f63..69409f8447b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
> @@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ static int ov2722_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> struct ov2722_device *dev = to_ov2722_sensor(sd);
>
> - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2722_remove...\n");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
>
> dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
> v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dev->ctrl_handler);
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists