lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96329062-9e00-28a7-749e-b57a34beb56c@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 15:57:50 +0200
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/interrupt: Refactor
 interrupt_exit_user_prepare() and syscall_exit_prepare()



Le 17/05/2021 à 09:44, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of May 14, 2021 6:28 pm:
>> Last part of interrupt_exit_user_prepare() and syscall_exit_prepare()
>> are identical.
>>
>> Create a __interrupt_exit_user_prepare() function that is called by
>> both.
>>
>> Note that it replaces a local_irq_save(flags) by local_irq_disable().
>> This is similar because the flags are never used. On ppc 8xx it is
>> more efficient because it doesn't require reading MSR.
> 
> Can these cleanups go after my interrupt performance improvements?
> I posted them for last series but were dropped due to crashes without
> time to resubmit. I'm working on them again now.
> 

Euh ... ok why not, but at the time being interrupt_exit_user_prepare() and syscall_exit_prepare() 
are very similar. Which makes sense because both of them are returning from kernel to user so they 
are to do the same preparation.

If you are doing the same changes to both of them, maybe it is worst including this refactor at the 
begining of your series. Or are you making them diverge with that series ?

Christophe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ