linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2-fix 1/1] x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <36760dae-2f61-2072-460a-f8359224fcf1@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 13:19:46 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2-fix 1/1] x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls

On 5/18/21 1:12 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>> [Isaku: proposed KVM VENDOR string]
>>> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>>> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> This SoB chain is odd.  Kirill wrote this, sent it to Isaku, who sent it
>> to Sathya?
> 
> Initially we have used "0" as vendor ID for KVM. But Isaku proposed a new
> value for it and sent a patch to fix it. But, I did not want to carry it as
> separate patch (for one line change). So I have merged his change with
> this patch, and added his signed-off with comment ([Isaku: proposed KVM
> VENDOR string])
> 
> +#define TDVMCALL_VENDOR_KVM            0x4d564b2e584454 /* "TDX.KVM" */

That's a combined Co-developed-by+Signed-off-by situation.  You don't
add a bare SoB for that.

But, seriously, you don't need to preserve a SoB for a one-line patch.
Just pull the line in and make a note in the changelog.