linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] uio_hv_generic: Fix a memory leak in error handling paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 21:50:17 +0000
From:   Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
CC:     KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] uio_hv_generic: Fix a memory leak in error handling
 paths

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] uio_hv_generic: Fix a memory leak in error handling
> paths
> 
> Cc Long Li.
> 
> Long, Stephen suggested I check with you. Do you have any opinion?
> 
> Wei.
> 
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:52:27AM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 09:13:03AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > If 'vmbus_establish_gpadl()' fails, the (recv|send)_gpadl will not
> > > be updated and 'hv_uio_cleanup()' in the error handling path will
> > > not be able to free the corresponding buffer.
> > >
> > > In such a case, we need to free the buffer explicitly.
> > >
> > > Fixes: cdfa835c6e5e ("uio_hv_generic: defer opening vmbus until
> > > first use")
> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> > > ---
> > > Before commit cdfa835c6e5e, the 'vfree' were done unconditionally in
> > > 'hv_uio_cleanup()'.
> > > So, another way for fixing the potential leak is to modify
> > > 'hv_uio_cleanup()' and revert to the previous behavior.
> > >
> >
> > I think this is cleaner.

Christophe has mentioned that the patch is already picked up by Greg KH.

I think both approaches are correct. We can go with this one.

> >
> > Stephen, you authored cdfa835c6e5e. What do you think?
> >
> > Christophe, OOI how did you discover these issues?
> >
> > > I don't know the underlying reason for this change so I don't know
> > > which is the best way to fix this error handling path. Unless there
> > > is a specific reason, changing 'hv_uio_cleanup()' could be better
> > > because it would keep the error handling path of the probe cleaner,
> IMHO.
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c | 8 ++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> > > b/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c index 0330ba99730e..eebc399f2cc7
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c
> > > @@ -296,8 +296,10 @@ hv_uio_probe(struct hv_device *dev,
> > >
> > >  	ret = vmbus_establish_gpadl(channel, pdata->recv_buf,
> > >  				    RECV_BUFFER_SIZE, &pdata->recv_gpadl);
> > > -	if (ret)
> > > +	if (ret) {
> > > +		vfree(pdata->recv_buf);
> > >  		goto fail_close;
> > > +	}
> > >
> > >  	/* put Global Physical Address Label in name */
> > >  	snprintf(pdata->recv_name, sizeof(pdata->recv_name), @@ -316,8
> > > +318,10 @@ hv_uio_probe(struct hv_device *dev,
> > >
> > >  	ret = vmbus_establish_gpadl(channel, pdata->send_buf,
> > >  				    SEND_BUFFER_SIZE, &pdata->send_gpadl);
> > > -	if (ret)
> > > +	if (ret) {
> > > +		vfree(pdata->send_buf);
> > >  		goto fail_close;
> > > +	}
> > >
> > >  	snprintf(pdata->send_name, sizeof(pdata->send_name),
> > >  		 "send:%u", pdata->send_gpadl);
> > > --
> > > 2.30.2
> > >