linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mfd: Binding for RTL8231

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 00:02:34 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: mfd: Binding for RTL8231

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 9:28 PM Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net> wrote:

> Add a binding description for the Realtek RTL8231, a GPIO and LED
> expander chip commonly used in ethernet switches based on a Realtek
> switch SoC. These chips can be addressed via an MDIO or SMI bus, or used
> as a plain 36-bit shift register.
>
> This binding only describes the feature set provided by the MDIO/SMI
> configuration, and covers the GPIO, PWM, and pin control properties. The
> LED properties are defined in a separate binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>

This looks correct from the GPIO side of things:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij