| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:29:22 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Remove some unnecessary
casts from KUnit tests
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 21:36, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly,
> > get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
>
> I guess you will funnel this via another tree than the mmc?
>
> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
Yeah: the plan is to have this whole series go through the
kselftest/kunit tree so we don't have to worry about potentially
temporarily introducing a bunch of compiler warnings.
Cheers,
-- David
> > ---
> > This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
> > first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
> > the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
> > particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
> >
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c | 34 ++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> > index bb67d159b7d8..1ed4f86291f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> > @@ -26,23 +26,23 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52(struct kunit *test)
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 25));
> >
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 181));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 182));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 183));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 184));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 203));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 204));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 205));
> > }
> >
> > @@ -67,21 +67,21 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200(struct kunit *test)
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 96));
> >
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 186));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 187));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 269));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 270));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 271));
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 276));
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists