lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1jwnrw1ohh.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 09:37:46 +0200
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, narmstrong@...libre.com,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     khilman@...libre.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] clk: meson: rounding for fast clocks on
 32-bit SoCs


On Mon 17 May 2021 at 22:37, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> wrote:

> On the 32-bit Amlogic Meson8/8b/8m2 SoCs we run into a problem with the
> fast HDMI PLL and it's OD (post-dividers). This clock tree can run at
> up to approx. 3GHz.
> This however causes a problem, because these rates require BIT(31) to
> be usable. Unfortunately this is not the case with clk_ops.round_rate
> on 32-bit systems. BIT(31) is reserved for the sign (+ or -).
>
> clk_ops.determine_rate does not suffer from this limitation. It uses
> an int to signal any errors and can then take all availble 32 bits for
> the clock rate.
>
> I am sending this as RFC to start a discussion whether:
> - this is a good way to solve it?

.determine_rate() was meant to replace .round_rate() so I guess it is
good to do it :)

> - what are the alternatives?

I don't see any ATM. Even with determine_rate(), 4.29GHz limitation
seems a bit low nowadays. In AML SoC, most PLLs should be able to reach
6GHz ... hopefully we won't need that on the 32bits variant ;)

> - getting some feedback on areas that need to be improved
>
>
> As always: any feedback is welcome!
>

Overall, looks good to me.

>
> Thank you!
> Martin
>
>
> Martin Blumenstingl (3):
>   clk: divider: Add re-usable determine_rate implementations
>   clk: meson: regmap: switch to determine_rate for the dividers
>   clk: meson: pll: switch to determine_rate for the PLL ops
>
>  drivers/clk/clk-divider.c      | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c    | 26 +++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/clk/meson/clk-regmap.c | 19 ++++++++---------
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h   |  6 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ