[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKNv5fsVaTrslJZw@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:42:29 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: bridge: cdns-mhdp8546: Fix PM reference leak in
cdns_mhdp_probe()
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:27:38AM +0200, Robert Foss wrote:
> Hey Yu,
>
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 10:08, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed.
> > Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here.
> > Fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage
> > counter balanced.
> >
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
> > index 0cd8f40fb690..305489d48c16 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
> > @@ -2478,7 +2478,7 @@ static int cdns_mhdp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> >
> > pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > dev_err(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync failed\n");
> > pm_runtime_disable(dev);
>
> The code is correct as it is. If pm_runtime_get_sync() fails and
> increments[1] the pm.usage_count variable, that isn't a problem since
> pm_runtime_disable() disables pm, and resets pm.usage_count variable
> to zero[2].
No it doesn't; pm_runtime_disable() does not reset the counter and you
still need to decrement the usage count when pm_runtime_get_sync()
fails.
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/pm_runtime.h#L384
> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L1383
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists