[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKN19XI/6Wpk9+Eh@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:08:21 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: wenhuizhang <wenhui@...ail.gwu.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcontrol: use flexible-array member
On Tue 18-05-21 01:20:36, wenhuizhang wrote:
>
> Change depracated zero-length-and-one-element-arrays into flexible
> array member.
> Zero-length and one-element arrays detected by Lukas's CodeChecker.
> Zero/one element arrays causes undefined behaviours if sizeof() used.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/processd/deprecated.html
I do understand why zero-length structures are discouraged for trail
space but does the same concern apply to internal padding inside
structures to enforce alignment to different cache lines? AFAIK this is
a trick we use at other places and I do not remember having heard about
any problems.
nodeinfo is a different case where flexible arrays seems reasonable to
me.
> Signed-off-by: wenhuizhang<wenhui@...ail.gwu.edu>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 0ce97eff79e2..f879efb1bc6e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ enum memcg_kmem_state {
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> struct memcg_padding {
> - char x[0];
> + char x[];
> } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
> #define MEMCG_PADDING(name) struct memcg_padding name;
> #else
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> struct deferred_split deferred_split_queue;
> #endif
>
> - struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[0];
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[];
> /* WARNING: nodeinfo must be the last member here */
> };
>
> --
> 2.17.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists