linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 12:28:36 +0300
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        hch@....de
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this

On Wed, 12 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> IIRC it's because of 74ffa5a3e685 ("mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack"),
>> which added a sanity check to make sure expectations were met. It turns
>> out they were not.
>> 
>> The bug is not new, the warning is. AFAIK the i915 team is aware, but
>> other than that I've not followed.
>
>
> The actual culprit is b12d691ea5e0 ("i915: fix remap_io_sg to verify the
> pgprot"), but otherwise agreed.  Someone the i915 maintainers all seem
> to be on vacation as the previous report did not manage to trigger any
> kind of reply.

We are aware. I've been rattling the cages to get more attention.


BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center