linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 4/8] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Add temp-alarm support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YKOpc+mi9fxVRMbI@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 17:18:03 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     satya priya <skakit@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, mka@...omium.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kgunda@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 4/8] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Add temp-alarm
 support

On 18-05-21, 11:50, satya priya wrote:
> Add temp-alarm node for PM8350C pmic and also modify gpio
> node to add gpio ranges and "qcom,spmi-gpio" compatible.

These should be two patches explaining why things are done like that

> 
> Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@...eaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> ---
> Changes in RESEND V4:
>  - No Changes.
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> index 2b9b75e..e1b75ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> @@ -13,13 +13,43 @@
>  		#address-cells = <1>;
>  		#size-cells = <0>;
>  
> +		pm8350c_temp_alarm: temp-alarm@a00 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
> +			reg = <0xa00>;
> +			interrupts = <0x2 0xa 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
> +			#thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
> +		};
> +
>  		pm8350c_gpios: gpio@...0 {
> -			compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-gpio";
> +			compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";

why is this changed?

>  			reg = <0x8800>;
>  			gpio-controller;
> +			gpio-ranges = <&pm8350c_gpios 0 0 9>;
>  			#gpio-cells = <2>;
>  			interrupt-controller;
>  			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>  		};
>  	};
>  };
> +
> +&thermal_zones {
> +	pm8350c_thermal: pm8350c-thermal {
> +		polling-delay-passive = <100>;
> +		polling-delay = <0>;
> +		thermal-sensors = <&pm8350c_temp_alarm>;
> +
> +		trips {
> +			pm8350c_trip0: trip0 {
> +				temperature = <95000>;
> +				hysteresis = <0>;
> +				type = "passive";
> +			};
> +
> +			pm8350c_crit: pm8350c-crit {
> +				temperature = <115000>;
> +				hysteresis = <0>;
> +				type = "critical";
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
> +};
> -- 
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member 
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

-- 
~Vinod