lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 20:03:52 +0800
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: LAPIC: Narrow the timer latency between
 wait_lapic_expire and world switch

On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 01:51, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> >
> > Let's treat lapic_timer_advance_ns automatically tune logic as hypervisor
> > overhead, move it before wait_lapic_expire instead of between wait_lapic_expire
> > and the world switch, the wait duration should be calculated by the
> > up-to-date guest_tsc after the overhead of automatically tune logic. This
> > patch reduces ~30+ cycles for kvm-unit-tests/tscdeadline-latency when testing
> > busy waits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > index c0ebef560bd1..552d2acf89ab 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > @@ -1598,11 +1598,12 @@ static void __kvm_wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >       guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
> >       apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta = guest_tsc - tsc_deadline;
> >
> > -     if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline)
> > -             __wait_lapic_expire(vcpu, tsc_deadline - guest_tsc);
> > -
> >       if (lapic_timer_advance_dynamic)
> >               adjust_lapic_timer_advance(vcpu, apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta);
> > +
> > +     guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
>
> This is redundant and unnecessary if automatic tuning is disabled, or if the
> timer did not arrive early.  A comment would also be helpful.  E.g. I think this
> would micro-optimize all paths:

Do it in v4, thanks.

    Wanpeng

>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index c0ebef560bd1..5d91f2367c31 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1598,11 +1598,19 @@ static void __kvm_wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>         guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
>         apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta = guest_tsc - tsc_deadline;
>
> +       if (lapic_timer_advance_dynamic) {
> +               adjust_lapic_timer_advance(vcpu, apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta);
> +               /*
> +                * If the timer fired early, reread the TSC to account for the
> +                * overhead of the above adjustment to avoid waiting longer
> +                * than is necessary.
> +                */
> +               if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline)
> +                       guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
> +       }
> +
>         if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline)
>                 __wait_lapic_expire(vcpu, tsc_deadline - guest_tsc);
> -
> -       if (lapic_timer_advance_dynamic)
> -               adjust_lapic_timer_advance(vcpu, apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta);
>  }
>
>  void kvm_wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> > +     if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline)
> > +             __wait_lapic_expire(vcpu, tsc_deadline - guest_tsc);
> >  }
> >
> >  void kvm_wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ