[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKPHSulXmAldvrDq@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 14:55:22 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 27/33] mm/writeback: Add folio_wait_stable
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:42:04PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 5/11/21 11:47 PM, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > Move wait_for_stable_page() into the folio compatibility file.
> > folio_wait_stable() avoids a call to compound_head() and is 14 bytes
> > smaller than wait_for_stable_page() was. The net text size grows by 24
> > bytes as a result of this patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> This seems to remove last user of thp_head(). Remove it as obsolete?
Good catch! I'll squash that in. We're down to just one user of
thp_order in my tree ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists