linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 042/111] virtio_net: Do not pull payload in skb->head

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YKRWHYiN1zXWHrfj@sashalap>
Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 20:04:45 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 042/111] virtio_net: Do not pull payload in skb->head

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:12 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Note that an issue related to this patch was recently reported.
>> It's quite possible that the root cause is a bug elsewhere
>> in the kernel, but it probably makes sense to defer the backport
>> until we know more ...
>
>I think the patch should be backported now, all issues have been sorted out ?

This is just 38ec4944b593 ("gro: ensure frag0 meets IP header
alignment"), right? I can queue both for the next round of releases.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha