[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d382048-17d5-e933-7c5e-1af7de218a16@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:26:50 +0530
From: Hriday Hegde <hridayhegde1999@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ashmem: Declared file operation with
'const' keyword
On 19-05-2021 20:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:06:14PM +0530, Hriday Hegde wrote:
>> On 19-05-2021 15:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
>>> Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
>>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>> A: Top-posting.
>>> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>>>
>>> http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:00:08PM +0530, Hriday Hegde wrote:
>>>> I am not really sure how to do that and how to reflect it in the patch i followed what was taught in the Beginners course and it does not mention building. I know i need to test it out but is running 'patch -p1 < x.patch what i need to do?
>>> That does not build the code you changed, right?
>>>
>>> I'm sure whatever course you took, it did reference the fact that you
>>> need to ensure that your change actually works properly by the very
>>> least being able to be compiled correctly. Please go over those
>>> instructions again.
>>>
>>> good luck!
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>> I am using the A Beginner's Guide to Linux Kernel Development (LFD103) by the linux foundation for this but i cant find any commands to as to build and test , the only way i tried compiling is with a custom Makefile and it didn't work, i've got a few errors so the const keyword might not work here since the variable is being written to.
>>
>>
> That is correct, when compiling (i.e. building), the compiler shows that
> this is not a correct change.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Oh ok will work with something else.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists