linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/67] KVM: X86: TDX support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3edc0fb2-d552-88df-eead-9e2b80e79be4@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 11:37:23 -0500
From:   Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@...hat.com>
To:     isaku.yamahata@...el.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/67] KVM: X86: TDX support

On 11/16/20 12:25 PM, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> 
> * What's TDX?
> TDX stands for Trust Domain Extensions which isolates VMs from
> the virtual-machine manager (VMM)/hypervisor and any other software on
> the platform. [1]
> For details, the specifications, [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], are
> available.
> 
> 
> * The goal of this RFC patch
> The purpose of this post is to get feedback early on high level design
> issue of KVM enhancement for TDX. The detailed coding (variable naming
> etc) is not cared of. This patch series is incomplete (not working).
> Although multiple software components, not only KVM but also QEMU,
> guest Linux and virtual bios, need to be updated, this includes only
> KVM VMM part. For those who are curious to changes to other
> component, there are public repositories at github. [8], [9]

Hi,

I'm planning on reading through this patch set; but before I do, since
it's been several months and it's a non-trivially sized series, I just
wanted to confirm that this is the latest revision of the RFC that
you'd like comments on. Or, if there's a more recent series that I've
missed, I would be grateful for a pointer to it.

Thanks,

Connor