linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] Staging: greybus: fix open parenthesis error in gbphy.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4af943f6-9baa-72a6-12b5-6b35179a7019@ieee.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 15:06:42 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
To:     "F.A.Sulaiman" <asha.16@...ac.mrt.ac.lk>, johan@...nel.org,
        elder@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Staging: greybus: fix open parenthesis error in
 gbphy.c

On 5/19/21 1:19 PM, F.A.Sulaiman wrote:
> This patch fix "Alignment should match open parenthesis" checkpatch error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "F.A.Sulaiman" <asha.16@...ac.mrt.ac.lk>

I have mixed feelings about this one.  This alignment rule
is fine, but I personally don't think it improves things.

Aside from that, there are a few more places in the Greybus
code that lead to exactly this warning.  So I guess, if we're
going to have the code follow this alignment rule, why not
just fix all spots at once (i.e., in a patch series)?

Anyway, I'll offer this, but perhaps others can provide
their opinion.

Acked-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>

> ---
>   drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
> index 9fc5c47be9bd..13d319860da5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct gbphy_host {
>   static DEFINE_IDA(gbphy_id);
>   
>   static ssize_t protocol_id_show(struct device *dev,
> -				 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>   {
>   	struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev = to_gbphy_dev(dev);
>   
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ void gb_gbphy_deregister_driver(struct gbphy_driver *driver)
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gb_gbphy_deregister_driver);
>   
>   static struct gbphy_device *gb_gbphy_create_dev(struct gb_bundle *bundle,
> -				struct greybus_descriptor_cport *cport_desc)
> +						struct greybus_descriptor_cport *cport_desc)
>   {
>   	struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev;
>   	int retval;
>