[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7729.1621463519@famine>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 15:31:59 -0700
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] bond_alb: don't rewrite bridged non-local MACs
Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> wrote:
>With a virtual machine behind a bridge on top of a bond, outgoing traffic
>should retain the VM's source MAC. That works fine most of the time, until
>doing a failover, and then the MAC gets rewritten to the bond slave's MAC,
>and the return traffic gets dropped. If we don't rewrite the MAC there, we
>don't lose any traffic.
Please have the log message here specify that this applies only
to balance-alb mode, and, the usual nomenclature for bonding patches is
"[PATCH] bonding:"; for this case, I'd suggest "balance-alb:" right
afterwards to be clear that it's only for alb mode. I didn't really
spot the "bond_alb" tag for what it was on first read, and it is the
only indication that this change is specific to alb mode other than the
patch itself.
>Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
>Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
>Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
>Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
>Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>Cc: Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>
>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>index 3455f2cc13f2..ce8257c7cbea 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>@@ -1302,6 +1302,26 @@ void bond_alb_deinitialize(struct bonding *bond)
> rlb_deinitialize(bond);
> }
>
>+static bool bond_alb_bridged_mac(struct bonding *bond, struct ethhdr *eth_data)
>+{
>+ struct list_head *iter;
>+ struct slave *slave;
>+
>+ if (BOND_MODE(bond) != BOND_MODE_ALB)
>+ return false;
>+
>+ /* Don't modify source MACs that do not originate locally
>+ * (e.g.,arrive via a bridge).
>+ */
>+ if (!netif_is_bridge_port(bond->dev))
>+ return false;
I believe this logic will fail if the plumbing is, e.g., bond ->
vlan -> bridge, as netif_is_bridge_port() would not return true for the
bond in that case.
Making this reliable is tricky at best, and may be impossible to
be correct for all possible cases. As such, I think the comment above
should reflect the limited scope of what is actually being checked here
(i.e., the bond itself is directly a bridge port).
-J
>+
>+ if (bond_slave_has_mac_rx(bond, eth_data->h_source))
>+ return false;
>+
>+ return true;
>+}
>+
> static netdev_tx_t bond_do_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
> struct slave *tx_slave)
> {
>@@ -1316,7 +1336,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t bond_do_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
> }
>
> if (tx_slave && bond_slave_can_tx(tx_slave)) {
>- if (tx_slave != rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
>+ if (tx_slave != rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave) &&
>+ !bond_alb_bridged_mac(bond, eth_data)) {
> ether_addr_copy(eth_data->h_source,
> tx_slave->dev->dev_addr);
> }
>--
>2.30.2
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists