lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 16:15:16 -0700
From:   "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>
To:     "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Jon Kohler" <jon@...anix.com>,
        "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Babu Moger" <babu.moger@....com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        "Jim Mattson" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        "Joerg Roedel" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
        "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@...il.com>,
        "Petteri Aimonen" <jpa@....mail.kapsi.fi>,
        "Kan Liang" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "Benjamin Thiel" <b.thiel@...teo.de>,
        "Fan Yang" <Fan_Yang@...u.edu.cn>,
        "Juergen Gross" <jgross@...e.com>,
        "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Ricardo Neri" <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Arvind Sankar" <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm list" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: add hint to skip hidden rdpkru under kvm_load_host_xsave_state

On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/17/21 12:46 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 14/05/21 07:11, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> That's nice, but it fails to restore XINUSE[PKRU].  As far as I know,
> >> that bit is live, and the only way to restore it to 0 is with
> >> XRSTOR(S).
> > 
> > The manual says "It is possible for XINUSE[i] to be 1 even when state
> > component i is in its initial configuration" so this is architecturally
> > valid.  Does the XINUSE optimization matter for PKRU which is a single
> > word?
> 
> In Linux with normal userspace, virtually never.
> 
> The hardware defaults PKRU to 0x0 which means "no restrictions on any
> keys".  Linux defaults PKRU via 'init_pkru_value' to the most
> restrictive value.  This ensures that new non-zero-pkey-assigned memory
> is protected by default.
> 
> But, that also means PKRU is virtually never in its init state in Linux.
>  An app would probably need to manipulate PKRU with XRSTOR to get
> XINUSE[PKRU]=0.
> 
> It would only even *possibly* be useful if running a KVM guest that had
> PKRU=0x0 (sorry I don't consider things using KVM "normal userspace" :P ).
> 

There was at least one report from the rr camp of glibc behaving differently depending on the result of XGETBV(1).  It's at least impolite to change the XINUSE register for a guest behind its back.

Admittedly that particular report wasn't about PKRU, and *Linux* guests won't run with XINUSE[PKRU]=0 under normal circumstances, but non-Linux guests could certainly do so.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ