[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZXd1Bcf2or=6RsP9GqR-LepXxjQHTP_r8b6idonEnFng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 01:47:03 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] ARM: mark prepare_page_table as __init
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:01 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> In some configurations when building with gcc-11, prepare_page_table
> does not get inline, which causes a build time warning for a section
> mismatch:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0xce8): Section mismatch in reference from the function prepare_page_table() to the (unknown reference) .init.data:(unknown)
> The function prepare_page_table() references
> the (unknown reference) __initdata (unknown).
> This is often because prepare_page_table lacks a __initdata
> annotation or the annotation of (unknown) is wrong.
>
> Mark the function as __init to avoid the warning regardless of the
> inlining, and remove the 'inline' keyword. The compiler is
> free to ignore the 'inline' here and it doesn't result in better
> object code or more readable source.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> v2: remove 'inline', as suggested by Russell and Ard
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists